Palliative Medicine

Objectives To explore the acceptability and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) using Alpha-Stim AID as a potential intervention for anxiety associated with breathlessness in people with advanced chronic respiratory disease. Methods A multicentre, mixed-methods, non-randomised interventional feasibility study with a parallel usual-care control group. Participants were adults with chronic respiratory disease and significant anxiety and breathlessness symptoms (assessed via Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale) receiving care from hospice services. The intervention groups used Alpha-Stim AID for eight weeks either at a fixed or personalised dose, followed by a four-week follow-up period. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy. Results 12.5% of screened patients at the primary site were eligible, and 29 unique participants were recruited. Three participants withdrew from the study (10.3%), none of which were attributable to CES. Most adverse events were mild, with headache reported frequently across control and intervention groups. Outcome measure completion was high, with data missingness below 6.4%. Numerical rating scales of anxiety and breathlessness fluctuated daily and remained broadly static, whereas GAD-7 scores assessing anxiety improved over time across all groups. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy. Conclusion CES using Alpha-Stim AID was deliverable within hospice services and was generally acceptable and tolerable among participants who enrolled. Our findings support further evaluation which should involve a fully-powered randomised controlled trial against a sham device to determine whether CES provides clinically meaningful improvements in anxiety for this patient population.

Background: Palliative care is suboptimal in pulmonary fibrosis. Symptom burden is high despite evidence-based interventions, guidelines, and information resources. The application of existing knowledge and methods to optimally manage palliative and end of life care for people with pulmonary fibrosis in the UK has not been realised. Aim: To establish patient views and understanding of how palliative care services and approaches can better meet the needs of people with pulmonary fibrosis. To identify the current barriers and facilitators to receiving palliative care services. Design: Qualitative exploration of patient views via semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Content analysis was conducted. Setting/Participants: The study was conducted from March to August 2024 within an Interstitial Lung Disease Specialist Centre, based in an NHS acute Trust. Results: Two focus groups and four interviews were conducted, involving nine patients. Four overarching themes were identified as to how palliative care can better meet the needs of this group: (1) establishing mechanisms for identifying and addressing palliative care needs; (2) open channels of communication with healthcare professionals; (3) the importance of a palliative care approach within respiratory, community and specialist services; and (4) support for unpaid/family carers. Conclusions: Patients highlighted the importance of person-centred principles and services that adapted to their needs (such as real-time telephone support), rather than services that imposed their own requirements on the patients. Understanding how existing palliative care provision can meet this standard could help improve the palliative and end of life care for people with pulmonary fibrosis.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive condition with high symptom burden. Advanced COPD management should relieve symptoms, optimise daily functioning and reduce carer burden, yet there is limited enactment of policy-advocated person-centred approaches to care and support. The Living with Breathlessness Study sought to establish evidence-based recommendations to inform a new paradigm to improve care and support in advanced COPD. Methods: Comprehensive multiple-perspective longitudinal evidence was collected on care, support, functioning and needs in advanced COPD from a population-based cohort of over 500 patients, their unpaid/family carers and health care professionals through semi-structured interviews and validated outcome measures over an 18-month period. Quantitative data analysed using standard descriptive statistics, numerical and univariate analyses, and qualitative data using a Framework approach. Recommendations were then generated through three linked strategies: (1) an expert multidisciplinary group, (2) a stakeholder workshop and (3) a stakeholder survey. Results: Six inter-related recommendations emerged, linked by the concept of proactive person-centred care, supported by action points to enable delivery. Recommendations in brief: (1) stop focusing on the challenge of prognostication as a barrier to meeting need, (2) change targets to incentivise person-centred care, (3) enable identification of patient support needs, (4) identify and support carers, (5) identify and respond to psychological morbidity, (6) change societal understandings of COPD, breathlessness, palliative care and informal carers. The recommendations garnered significant support from stakeholders, with caution regarding ease of implementation. Conclusions: Enactment of the resulting six evidence-based recommendations, through their action points, could inform a new paradigm to improve care and support in advanced COPD recognising the slow relentless progression of non-malignant disease, and its effect on patients and their carers. They hold potential for other patients and unpaid/family carers who are living in between conventional disease management and end-of-life care, and for those HCPs striving to support them.

Background Falls are a major safety concern in healthcare. In palliative care, patients are particularly vulnerable due to complex symptom burdens and rapid physical decline. However, standard falls risk assessment tools, primarily designed for acute clinical environments, rely on static risk scores and lack efficacy in hospice settings. The Falls Early Warning Score (FEWS) is a observational tool developed to address the specific contributing factors and complex needs of palliative patients. Aims To explore and understand staff views regarding the implementation, utility, and benefits of the FEWS tool to identify people at risk of falling in a specialist palliative care inpatient unit. Methods A mixed-methods study was conducted at a UK hospice. Healthcare professionals with clinical experience using the FEWS chart completed an electronic questionnaire assessing their confidence, practice, and perceived barriers. Questionnaire outcomes informed subsequent face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were evaluated using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Eleven staff completed the questionnaire, and five participated in interviews. Three major themes were identified: (1) Education, highlighting staff preferences for 1:1 training and the necessity of dedicated user guides; (2) Location and format of the FEWS tool, contrasting the data collection benefits of electronic formats against the bedside accessibility of paper charts; and (3) Recognised benefits of the FEWS tool, including its ability to prompt safe staffing levels, highlight variable patient presentation, and mitigate the emotional and physical impact of falls. Conclusions It is feasible and highly acceptable to integrate bespoke falls risk assessment tools into palliative care. By addressing the unique complexities of hospice patients, customised tools like FEWS can empower staff and support dynamic clinical decision-making. Further research is required to evaluate their clinical efficacy in reducing falls.

Background: Breaking bad news (BBN) is an essential part of healthcare communication especially in the fields of oncology. palliative care and life threatening illness. Objective: This study aims to analyze the global research trends, publication patterns and the intellectual structure of BBN literature from 2000 to 2025. Methods: Bibliometric study was performed on Scopus database. A total of 843 publications were retrieved and analyzed by bibliometric techniques. Visualization tools such as VOSviewer and R Studio were employed, along with Lotkas and Bradford laws. Results: The findings indicate that there is a steady growth of publications. The United States emerged as the leading contributor. Journals including Patient Education and Counseling were dominant in the field. Key areas of focus identified through thematic analysis included oncology, palliative care and communication, while emerging themes included empathy and telemedicine. Conclusion: BBN research has evolved into a mature, interdisciplinary field with increasing emphasis on patient centered communication.

Background Digital legacy (the digital information available about someone following their death) has increasing societal importance as personal assets and interactions become increasingly digitized. Healthcare professionals often have a limited understanding of how to address digital legacy in practice, and there is a lack of interdisciplinary networks to improve education, research, and professional development in digital legacy. Objective This paper describes the development of an interdisciplinary initiative designed to build research capacity and develop consensus-based recommendations for integrating digital legacy into palliative care. Method Over 12-months, we conducted interdisciplinary engagement activities with diverse stakeholders, including clinicians, designers, and sociologists. We used a modified World Cafe method to facilitate dialogue and capture feedback on how memories are digitally curated, the management of digital estates, and intergenerational perspectives on digital legacy. Results We identified eight core recommendations for research and policy, including promoting digital legacy education, supporting policy development, and broadening the scope of interdisciplinary research. Our discussions highlighted the complexity of modern digital estates and the need for legal and ethical frameworks to protect individual rights. Conclusions The Network demonstrates that interdisciplinary collaboratives can address important issues relating to digital legacy, which provides a foundation to conduct collaborative research that improves the management of digital legacies in society.

Abstract Background: Hospital discharge from coronary care units (CCUs) is commonly framed as a discrete clinical or administrative endpoint. This event-based conceptualisation obscures the ongoing nursing and interprofessional work undertaken across the admission to stabilise discharge readiness. Aim: To theorise discharge readiness in CCUs as anticipatory nursing and interprofessional work and to examine how professional roles, organisational systems and service contexts shape discharge across two national context. Design: Qualitative study utilising reflexive thematic analysis. Methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 37 clinicians (nurses, allied health professionals and medical staff) working in CCUs in Australia and the United Kingdom. Reflexive Thematic Analysis was undertaken inductively within each dataset, followed by higher-level interpretive integration. Results: Four interrelated themes conceptualised discharge readiness as: (1) anticipatory nursing work initiated at admission and sustained through ongoing assessment, coordination and documentation; (2) negotiated readiness achieved through interprofessional alignment and distributed expertise; (3) discharge documentation as a site of organisational tension shaping workflow and communication; and (4) discharge flow constrained by system-level pressures, downstream service availability and policy logics. Across both national contexts, nurses were positioned as custodians of discharge readiness through continuous monitoring, relational coordination and informal risk management, although enactment varied by organisational setting. Conclusion: This study contributes to nursing scholarship by positioning discharge readiness not as a single decision point, but as an emergent outcome of anticipatory nursing labour, interprofessional negotiation and organisational systems. By making visible the distributed and often hidden work underpinning discharge, the findings extend existing models of transitional care and provide a theoretically grounded foundation for strengthening discharge practice in coronary care nursing.

Introduction People with severe mental illness (SMI) and learning disabilities (LD) experience significant health inequalities, with diet-related conditions contributing substantially to early and preventable death. Despite high levels of nutritional risk, the presence and effectiveness of nutritional screening in mental health (MH) and LD settings remains under-researched. This study aimed to investigate nutritional screening practices in UK inpatient MH and LD services from the perspectives of dietitians. Methods A cross-sectional mixed-methods study was conducted using a novel 22-question online survey. Data was collected via the British Dietetic Association Mental Health Specialist Group (April-June 2025). Quantitative data was analysed descriptively and qualitative data by reflexive thematic analysis. Findings were integrated and presented thematically. Ethical approval was granted by Teesside University (2025Mar26544). Results Forty-seven dietitians participated, most with substantial dietetic experience, from a range of MH settings. Screening practices were widely established and supported by policy and audit. However, participants reported low confidence in screening translating into meaningful patient care. Barriers to screening included appropriateness of available tools, time constraints, difficulty engaging distressed patients and poor prioritisation of physical health. Digital integration and wider infrastructure were also important. Dietitians rarely undertook screening directly, instead holding secondary or leadership roles, while screening was most often completed by nursing staff who were often perceived to place limited importance on the process. Existing tools, particularly the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), were viewed as insufficiently capturing the broader nutritional risks relevant to MH/LD populations, leading some services to adopt bespoke, unvalidated tools. Conclusion Concerns regarding the suitability of existing nutritional screening tools in MH/LD settings are consistent with previous literature. However, we suggest cautious use of unvalidated bespoke tools. Whilst there was no clear front runner, MH specific tools such as the St Andrews Nutrition Screening Instrument (SANSI) and the NutriMental Screener warrant further evaluation. Importantly, findings indicate that optimising tool choice alone is unlikely to improve screening effectiveness. Nutritional screening must be embedded within clear care pathways, supported by organisational leadership, digital infrastructure, and multiprofessional engagement to move beyond procedural completion and support meaningful clinical action to improve patient care.

Background Sepsis is a life-threatening medical condition caused by the bodys extreme response to an infection. It can have lasting physical, cognitive, psychological and social consequences that extend beyond the acute illness. However, limited research has explored how people with a history of sepsis and their families experience these longer-term consequences and engage with healthcare services in Ireland. Methods A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 21 participants, including 14 people who had personally experienced sepsis and seven family members of people affected by sepsis. Participants were recruited through professional networks and a sepsis charity organisation in Ireland. Interviews were conducted by telephone or Zoom between May and June 2026, audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic analysis. Results Five themes were identified: (1) recovery - a prolonged journey of physical & cognitive rebuilding; (2) navigating a recovery journey: lack co-ordination and integration; (3) continuity of support was uneven and often depended on individual healthcare professionals; (4) recovery reshaped family roles, work and everyday life; and (5) participants suggested a more coordinated approach to recovery. Participants described persistent physical, cognitive and psychological difficulties, alongside substantial effects on family responsibilities, employment and everyday activities. While some participants experienced valuable support from individual healthcare professionals, many described fragmented services, limited information about recovery and uncertainty about where to seek ongoing support. Conclusion Individuals with a history of sepsis and their families described substantial and ongoing consequences and variable experiences of longer-term care. The findings highlight the need to better recognise and respond to longer-term health needs following sepsis and to develop coordinated, accessible approaches to ongoing support in Ireland.

In increasingly strained socio-political-economic contexts, reliance on community supports deepens, particularly for those failed by or unable to access appropriate care through statutory services. However, little is known about the scope, equity-oriented provision or the conditions that enable and constrain community care. This mapping addressed these gaps, exploring community services in London and Greater Manchester, supporting children's mental health and wellbeing. Co-produced with co-researchers and community stakeholders from conceptualisation to dissemination, we conducted a systematic scoping of community-based services, not government-provided or commissioned, offering free mental health or wellbeing support for children (0-18 years), carers, or families. We extracted service characteristics and equity-oriented provision, and provider and stakeholder insights informed a collaborative narrative synthesis. We identified 297 eligible services (261 London, 41 Greater Manchester), with 48.9% of initially identified services excluded due to government commissioning/contracts. The majority (84%) advertised at least one equity-oriented practice, most commonly cultural safety/specific care (38%), though few explicitly intersectional (11%). Among those with a primary specialisation, support for violence and abuse was highest (12%). Services predominantly supported older children, with gaps in early intervention and prevention. The synthesis revealed trade-offs and tensions: responsiveness competes with planning, capacity-building and communications; navigation barriers alongside selective information sharing; and the ripple effects of funding precarity undermining provision and choice. Community supports are relied on yet structurally vulnerable. As policy increasingly emphasises community partnerships, this requires sustainable funding models, collaboration guidance and resourcing to embed equity-oriented practices.

Background: Care home research often fails to address issues that matter most to residents, families, and staff. Priority-setting exercises can help reduce this lack of inclusivity, but few have received significant resident responses. Objectives: To identify research priorities of UK care home stakeholders (including residents; relatives; care staff, managers and owners; healthcare professionals; policymakers and researchers), and to assess whether these priorities can be addressed using existing research datasets. Methods: PREACH was an 18-month research priority-setting study involving 1063 stakeholders, across 50 care homes, including 381 residents. Participants submitted ideas of what care home research should focus on through 1) care home activity sessions or 2) an online survey. Responses underwent content analysis to identify themes, and these themes were mapped against a national repository of care home trial data. Results: Fifty-one themes were identified. The most frequent priority across all stakeholder groups was access to meaningful activities for residents (22%). Relatives and residents emphasised social connection and day-to-day experience, whereas staff more often highlighted system pressures. No stakeholder-prioritised topics were directly addressable using existing secondary datasets. Conclusions: Collaboration with care home teams to reach large numbers of residents offers a practical route to producing more relevant and timely care home research. Care home stakeholders consistently prioritise quality of life, meaningful activity and staffing over disease-specific or health-focused research. Existing research datasets measure relatively few of the priorities identified by residents, highlighting the need for resident-centred outcome measures and data collection.

Humans often communicate meaningfully during existential transition, yet the structure of final communications before death remains poorly understood. Suicide notes provide rare behavioral records, but two questions remain unresolved: whether note-leavers represent the broader population of suicide decedents, and whether notes follow systematic narrative structures. We analyzed a nationwide police-investigated registry of 102,922 suicide deaths in South Korea from 2013 to 2020, including 38,044 notes. Note-leavers differed systematically from non-leavers across demographic, situational and behavioral characteristics, indicating that note production reflects a selective communicative act within the suicidal process. Modeling notes as sequential narratives, we identified consistent patterns across opening, middle and closing sections, organized around apology and shame, love and gratitude, and practical directives concerning post-mortem affairs. Emotional trajectories also varied by age and gender. These findings provide population-scale evidence that suicide notes are structured final communications shaped by social relationships and demographic context under extreme circumstances.

Background Agenda-setting is a fundamental patient-centered communication practice in which a clinician works with a patient to elicit, propose, and organize topics for discussion during a clinical encounter. Various agenda-setting interventions have been developed, including patient-facing tools and clinician training, but their effects have not been systematically evaluated. We aimed to determine the effects of these interventions on encounter, patient, care partner, and clinician outcomes. Methods We searched grey literature and seven databases, including PubMed, from inception through July 2025 for randomized and non-randomized comparative studies of interventions designed to promote or improve clinical visit agenda-setting. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data, with a third reviewer resolving conflicts. We assessed risk of bias using RoB 2 for randomized studies and ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. We conducted random effects meta-analyses when outcomes were sufficiently comparable, assessed heterogeneity using I2, and rated certainty of evidence using GRADE. Post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses examined study design, adjustment status, and intervention structure. Results Twenty-nine articles describing 22 unique studies met the inclusion criteria, including 13 randomized and nine non-randomized studies. Agenda-setting interventions increased the occurrence of agenda-setting (risk ratio 5.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.06 to 14.28, I2=34.6%) and favored the intervention for concerns addressed when measured as a continuous outcome (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.57, I2=65.3%) and overall clinician satisfaction (SMD 0.50, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.78, I2=0.0%). There were no clear differences in the number of concerns raised (mean difference (MD) 0.21, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61, I2=59.6%), visit duration (MD 0.64 minutes, 95% CI -0.83 to 2.12, I2=51.4%), or overall patient satisfaction (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.15, I2=47.0%). Potentially important heterogeneity was present for four of these six outcomes. Post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses did not provide clear evidence that effects varied by study design, adjustment status, or intervention structure. Risk of bias was often high, serious, or critical, and certainty of evidence was low or very low for all pooled outcomes. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive synthesis of clinical visit agenda-setting interventions. Such interventions may increase the occurrence of agenda-setting and the extent to which patient concerns are addressed without increasing visit length. However, the certainty of evidence was low or very low, and the available evidence does not establish a superior intervention structure.

Background: Mobile outreach initiatives have emerged to address persistent barriers to care for people experiencing homelessness, substance use, and mental illness. Although these models show promise, less is known about how and under what conditions they enable engagement and coordinated care. This study explains how, why, and under what circumstances a mobile, cross sector outreach model enables access to care for marginalized populations. Methods: We conducted a realist evaluation of Supportive Outreach Services (S.O.S.), a mobile, cross sector outreach program in Grey County, Ontario. Data included 31 semi structured interviews with outreach providers, partner organizations, system leaders, and clients, supplemented by document review and stakeholder feedback. Using retroductive reasoning and constant comparison, we developed and refined context mechanism outcome configurations to construct an explanatory program theory. Results: Five interconnected realist explanations account for how the model enables access to care. Trust built through repeated, non judgmental encounters supports engagement; proximity reduces barriers to participation; accessible support enables timely help seeking; cross sector relationships enable adaptive coordination; and visible results build legitimacy that sustains participation and resources. Together, these explanations provide a linked explanatory account of how mobile outreach reduces friction between marginalized populations and fragmented services while identifying the structural conditions that constrain its effectiveness. Conclusions: The effectiveness of mobile outreach depends less on the services delivered than on its capacity to reduce friction, sustain relationships, and adapt care across organizational boundaries. The resulting program theory offers transferable explanations for designing coordinated community based services while highlighting the structural conditions required for durable change.

Background Hospital overheating arising from more frequent heatwaves threatens healthcare staff wellbeing, patient safety and service continuity, but is often managed as an estates or seasonal problem. We examined how interacting organisational, infrastructural and experiential conditions sustain overheating vulnerability and unequal thermal burden in hospitals in the south of England. Methods We conducted a six-phase, multi-source qualitative systems inquiry integrating 129 overheating incident reports from two National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in Hampshire, England, six stakeholder interviews, two focus groups with healthcare staff and patients (n=12), and a national stakeholder refinement focus group (n=4). AI-supported thematic analysis was combined with context-mechanism-outcome synthesis and iterative AcciMap construction, to produce an integrated systems explanation. Results Twenty themes were consolidated into six interacting explanatory pathways: 1) recognition without durable resilience; 2) hidden visibility; 3) workaround-based resilience; 4) unequal adaptive capacity; 5) underuse of emergency preparedness and business-continuity systems; 6) institutional framing. The analysis indicated that, within the hospital settings investigated, overheating persisted despite recognition because ownership, information, resources and delivery capacity were fragmented across system levels. Frontline workarounds sustained care but could conceal thermal burden and defer structural adaptation. Staff and patients had unequal capacity to regulate exposure because of differences in mobility, autonomy, physiology, clinical dependency and occupational role. Existing preparedness systems offered a route from seasonal reaction to anticipatory action, but overheating was not consistently embedded within them. The AcciMap showed how shared factors connected the six pathways and identified coordinated intervention entry points across monitoring, governance, preparedness, service delivery and infrastructure. Conclusions Overheating in hospitals in England is best understood as a socio-technical patient-safety and adaptation challenge, not a single-domain estates problem. Our analysis indicates that durable resilience requires environmental intelligence linked to accountable decisions, support for staff and patient adaptation, activation of preparedness systems and long-term infrastructure change.

Background: Health visiting in England is a universal service designed to identify family need and offer more support where needed (proportionate universalism). We know little about how local areas deliver services for families facing adversity or their associated outcomes. Methods: Using linked Community Services Data Set and Hospital Episode Statistics data (2018-20) for 57/152 areas, we (a) described health visiting service delivery for children whose mother had a previous hospital admission with mental health issues, alcohol/substance misuse or violence/abuse recorded (study definition of adversity), (b) identified common service delivery patterns using latent class analysis; and (c) tested whether patterns were associated with child and maternal outcomes, overall and in terms of inequalities for families facing adversity. We conducted four experts-by-experience workshops to aid interpretation. Results: Three service delivery patterns for families facing adversity emerged, distinguished primarily by the intensity and age-distribution of contacts. In areas where health visiting was delivered with a high intensity across the whole 0-5 years age range (rather than targeted primarily at babies), children were more likely to meet expected levels of development at age 2-2.5 years (ORadj: 0.79, 95% CI:0.63-0.99) and child inequalities in injury-related hospital admissions and some developmental domains were reduced. Conclusions: We found that a pattern of health visiting aligned with proportionate universalism was associated with mitigating disadvantage for families facing adversity. With limited outcomes and forms of adversity captured in our study, we cannot say which service delivery pattern is best, but our findings evidence the potential of health visiting to reduce inequalities.

Background Effective communication during consultations is facilitated by clinical empathy and realistic optimism, and can enhance patient satisfaction with care, alleviate symptoms, and improve quality of life. However, primary care systems are under significant strain and changing rapidly, which may affect practitioners' ability to communicate empathically and convey realistic optimism, with implications for the patient-practitioner relationship and patient outcomes. Understanding patients' perspectives of healthcare communication in the current clinical context is therefore important. We aimed to explore patients' experiences and perceptions of communication in UK primary care consultations, focussing on the communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism. Methods A qualitative interview study was conducted as part of a multi-centre cluster-randomised trial of EMPathicO, a brief e-learning package for Primary Care Practitioners (PCPs) on communicating clinical empathy and realistic optimism. Participants were not aware whether their general practice had access to EMPathicO or not. Interviews were conducted within 7-14 days of participants' consultations, explored their views and experiences of clinical empathy and realistic optimism, and were transcribed verbatim. Interviews were analysed using Ritchie and Spencer's Framework Method. Results We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded qualitative telephone interviews with 71 participants from 29 primary care practices taking part in the EMPathicO trial. Following comprehensive mapping of data to the framework derived following initial analysis, four themes were agreed. Overall, most participants described positive empathic consultations with their PCPs, however, participants' experiences were shaped by wider systemic and contextual factors. They described a stretched and inefficient primary care system impacting empathy and optimism; the impact of PCP 'preparedness' as a marker for empathy; how consultation modality (i.e. in-person or telephone) shaped perceptions of empathy, and how PCPs sharing next steps in participants' treatment and management could foster realistic optimism. Conclusions While clinical empathy and realistic optimism may be experienced by patients during consultations with practitioners, the wider contextual challenges of accessing and navigating primary care systems can threaten overall perceptions of feeling cared for. Future primary care policy and workforce training must consider these system pressures to preserve effective communication in consultations and positive patient-practitioner encounters.

Purpose Prescribing to lactating women is constrained by limited evidence. Published compatibility classifications provide clinical guidance and a discrete research comparator. How often prescribing diverges from that guidance, and what characteristics are associated with divergence, is unknown at national scale. Methods Retrospective analysis of prescriptions filled during lactation, identified in the 2012-2014 MarketScan Commercial Claims Database. Prescriptions were classified as concordant (Hale's lactation risk category L1-L3) or discordant (L4-L5). Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with concordance. Results Of 96,484 new prescriptions, 95,710 (99.2%) were concordant and 774 (0.8%) were discordant. Discordant prescriptions were filled later after delivery (median 59 vs 33 days) and had a day supply three times longer (30 vs 10 days). In multivariable analysis (N=28,732), concordant prescriptions were associated with maternal age under 35 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.75) and chronic-condition medications (aOR=10.94, 95% CI: 6.47-18.50), and were less likely within 14 days of delivery (aOR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.38-0.73) and with each additional day of supply (aOR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.96-0.96). Compared with family practice, concordance did not differ for obstetric, internal medicine, or emergency medicine prescriptions, but prescriptions from other provider types had lower odds of concordance (aOR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.41-0.79). Conclusions Prescribing during lactation was overwhelmingly concordant with published compatibility guidance; the rare divergence was patterned by prescription and prescriber characteristics. Because the categories are an expert classification rather than consensus guidance, divergence should not be read as inappropriate prescribing.

Background: Trauma-informed approaches (TIAs) are increasingly implemented across public-sector settings to improve support for young people affected by adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). However, practitioners often report difficulties translating broad trauma-informed principles into everyday practice, and young people are rarely involved in developing resources intended to support implementation. Aim: To co-design, implement and undertake a preliminary evaluation of a youth-led trauma-informed resource for professionals working with young people in public-sector settings in England. Methods: The study formed part of the UKRI-funded Attune programme and employed Accelerated Experience-Based Co-Design (AEBCD). Eighteen adolescents with lived experience of ACEs and 16 professionals from nine public-sector settings participated in three regional co-design workshops. Findings from a prior arts-based lived experience study informed the workshops. Participants collaboratively developed Validating Voices, a low-cost resource designed to increase validating interactions between professionals and young people. The resource was subsequently introduced into nine organisations and evaluated using staff surveys and semi-structured interviews. Results: Co-design participants identified professional invalidation of young peoples experiences, identities, needs and emotions as an under-recognised contributor to mental health. The resulting resource combined discussion cards, creative activities, role-play and organisational reflection exercises to promote validating practices. Five organisations implemented the resource and reported it to be feasible. Flexible local adaptation was common, while more participatory role-play elements proved harder to implement consistently. Staff observed increased opportunities for disclosure, reflection, peer connection and professional curiosity about young peoples experiences. Staff reported listening differently to young people and, in some settings, implementing changes in response to young people's recommendations. Conclusions: Youth-led co-design identified validation as a practical and meaningful mechanism for operationalising trauma-informed principles in everyday professional practice. With refinements, Validating Voices shows promise as a resource to support more relational, collaborative and trauma-informed responses to young people in public sector settings.

Those leaving military service frequently present with complex psychosocial problems, but military veterans are often reluctant to engage with statutory healthcare provision. Specialist mental health services have recently been established in the UK to specifically support military veterans with their psychological and social wellbeing. We explored the treatment and support provided by the London branch of a military veterans mental health and wellbeing service (Op COURAGE) from the perspectives of the multidisciplinary service team and their partner organisations and collaborators. We conducted semi-structured interviews with multidisciplinary service staff and members of their partner organisations and external agencies. Qualitative data were analysed using framework analysis.?A total of 16 professionals participated in this study, comprising five service staff, eight collaborators and three partner agency participants. Five themes with subthemes were identified, including (1) blended networks, (2) staff inclusivity and sensitivity, (3) spectrum of psychosocial interventions and holistic support, (4) referral mechanisms, and (5) (in)visibility of the service and advertising. Our evaluation highlighted the advantages of a multidisciplinary team and collaborative partnerships to meet the psychosocial needs of veteran and their significant others. We have proposed that service improvement could include increasing advertisement about this specialist service, deepening knowledge about veterans among staff and further involving veterans and key stakeholders in service decisions.